----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> > To: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 2:34:10 PM > Subject: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy > > On 03/02/2012 12:27 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > Well, Fedora ships packages. I might be stupid but would someone > > please explain me how can one deliver fixed/improved packages to > > users without do at least a bit of packaging work. I don't see a > > way this to happen. > > Spec files are no rocket science and the process for them is heavily > backed up by FPG. Sure spec files are no rocket science, it's not the format and syntax but the content that matters. > > One way to achieve that would be that one could do so by becoming > proven > packager through some kind of mentoring process ( which does not > exist > btw ) I would think. Hmm, proven packagers are still packagers aren't they? I thought you were asking about someone fixing things without being packager. > > Atleast I would think you would have to first complete that step then > proceed into being allowed to actually patch the actual source of the > component. Nope, if you are a packager already and you have a unit file you want to push in my package just ask me about commit rights via pkgdb and a mail explaining it and I'll definetely approve your request and I'm pretty sure that a number of packagers will do that too. Alex > > JBG > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
