On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 08:21:13AM -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 12:07 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > > [*] this is half true, for FC2-shipped modutils this was forgotten, > > but there is a bugzilla entry with appropriate patches that hopefully > > made it for FC3. > > thomasvs's patches are in upstream module-init-tools now (well, at > least, equivalent functionality is; istr that Rusty did the > implementation slightly differently) But he did uses /updates/ and not /extra/ as the preferred path for looking up modules? It looks like even in kernel hacker land there is still no real consensus on where exernal modules should get placed in. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpEYzGaDK7VV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
