On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:14:49PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > On 2/27/12 8:37 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > >Orion Poplawski<orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >>On 02/27/2012 09:09 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > >>>WTF? Do I need to fix this, and if so how? > > > >>git pull > >>(to bring in the f17 branch and mark devel as f18) > > > >Hmm, that package indeed hadn't had f17 git pull'd yet. (I had scripted > >a git pull in all my package directories after the branch, but I think > >that it failed in this one due to uncommitted changes.) > > > >So you're saying that fedpkg's behavior depends on the existence of > >other, un-checked-out, branches in my local repo? This seems a > >tad ... unreliable. Not to say surprising. > > > > regards, tom lane > > I was looking for a way to determine the behavior of the master > branch (for the sake of dist values) without hitting the network, as > that would break git's ability to work offline. The best I could > come up with at the time this code was written was to check and see > what other branches existed, and just increment the biggest one by > one. I welcome suggestions for better ways to manage this. Didn't RHEL-CVS use a file in the local directory called 'branch'(?) Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into Xen guests. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-p2v -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
