Daniel Roesen wrote:
No, RHEL has a too long innovation cycle. What I need is something
like the Fedora release (innovation) cycle, together with a RHEL-like
support cycle.
And redhat decided that these 2 items, short innovation cycle + long support cycle, are mutually exclusive. redhat would end up "supporting" 5-6 releases (going back ~3 years @ ~ 6 month innovation cycle), which would be unmanageable. Is that really what you want?
Besides, IMO, RHEL is pretty good when it comes to innovation too. Are there features missing from RHEL that you need?
-- Rex
