Re: the fate of firewire

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 10:50 +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 09:33:34AM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > there still appears to be problems with firewire, even in UP kernels.
> > This makes me not happy ;-(
> > 
> > The problem seems to mostly be people who do have a firewire controller
> > but no firewire devices, and the symptoms are general "hangs during
> > bootup sequence". 
> > 
> > We already disabled firewire in smp kernels for this, but I fear that if
> > things don't improve really soon that firewire becomes unkeepable for UP
> > kernels as well.....
> 
> Could you please think about prolonging the FC1 support cycle until
> there is a usable 2.6-based distro out there?

If you are interested in longer support for FC1, join the Fedora Legacy
project:
http://fedoralegacy.org/

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 Alexander Larsson                                            Red Hat, Inc 
                   alexl@xxxxxxxxxx    alla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
He's a world-famous dishevelled paramedic who hides his scarred face behind a 
mask. She's a cynical African-American museum curator prone to fits of savage, 
blood-crazed rage. They fight crime! 



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux