Le Ven 17 février 2012 18:40, Adam Williamson a écrit : > On 2012-02-17 10:28, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> Well, as we discussed the other day on IRC, we pretty much all agreed >> that it's not in the spirit of the FHS to have these files in /lib >> or /usr/lib. The only reason they were ever in /lib to begin with is >> because /share didn't exist (and at the time we were (correctly) >> positioning systemd as being prefix=/ and not prefix=/usr). > > That wasn't the impression I got. Some people at least seemed to be > arguing that /usr/share was no more 'correct' for systemd unit files > than /usr/lib/systemd is. Trying to distinguish between code and data is a lost cause. arch independant vs arch dependant is a clean simple boundary and the one fedora has historically supported (look where lisp or java code is today) -- Nicolas Mailhot -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
