Am 17.02.2012 18:00, schrieb Nathaniel McCallum: > Move systemd unit files to /usr/share and provide simple logic to fall back /lib, so as not to break upgrades with > custom unit files. I am certainly not advocating a bad user experience. If the schedule doesn't permit it, I'm ok > with delaying the move to /usr/share until f18. However, I would want to avoid two moves at all costs. I can't > imagine moving them to /usr/shared is a huge task (considering any bugs you would hit would likely already be hit > by UsrMove anyway) or that moving the unit files from /lib to /usr/share is any different than moving them from > /lib to /usr/lib. So the upgrade experience can't be really harmed by such a move. you are missing the point that /lib/ to /usr/lib is a theoretical not invasive change by replacing /lib with a symlink! moving things around the filesystem means you are breaking each sort of scripts and whatever customized software is runnign at the users machines - can we please stop to enforce permanently chaning paths all over the world for some beautniess reason without any technical point for it
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
