Am 16.02.2012 00:48, schrieb Al Dunsmuir: > On Wednesday, February 15, 2012, 6:12:44 PM, Reindl wrote: >> this will not work since if a systemd-unit is present >> systemd no longer is interested in anything from >> /etc/init.d/ > >> so there is no solution except patch systemd if iptables.service is >> called which will not happen because it would be unmaintainable >> ober the long and doing it for iptables would bring a lot of >> of other people complaining "but why not XXX whateverservice" too > > Johann has spent some significant time contributing to the last two > Fedora releases, specifically a great deal of the actual conversion to > systemd init. > > I'm sure that he and others can get something functioning rather > quickly by working _with_ the systemd developers. Even better, my > experience is that both Johann and Lennart are fully capable of coming > up these answers without filling everyone's days with bile and crass > negativity. > > Why not let them have a chance, instead of insisting on using every > opportunity to attempt to advance your own twisted viewpoint? what is your exactly problem here? well, wait their replies that they will not include all sorts of exceptions for random services in systemd because their target is holding systemd clean and compact to prvent the need of the next init-system switch in few years
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
