Re: /usrmove and path ordering

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 02/15/2012 10:37 AM, drago01 wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Kevin Kofler<kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx>
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Because dropping these dirs from the search paths is merely an
>>>> optimization, not a requirement.
>>>
>>>
>>> You call it an "optimization", I call it fixing a pessimization
>>> (performance
>>> regression).
>>>
>>> And as the original message in the thread points out, the regression
>>> actually affects more than just performance, it also causes genuine bugs
>>> (with automatic prefix detection in applications).
>>
>>
>> So? Should we drop all features that aren't bug free after feature freeze?
>
> Yes. We've forked f17 and you guys are still chasing elementary bugs.

"elementary bugs" ? You got to be either kidding or trolling.

> What do you expect Fedora users to think of this?

We are at pre alpha / alpha ... users should not have to care about
that right now.

>It communicates a nice
> impression of the quality of your works.

I am not involved in this so it is not "my works" ...

> Better stop this non-sense now!

The only nonsense I see here is people ranting for the sake of ranting.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux