On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 17:33 +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote: > On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 17:11 +0100, Ondrej Vasik wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 17:08 +0100, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > Dear developers, > > > > > > Now that the /usrmove changes have landed in the F-17 branch, should > > > the ordering of directories in PATH be changed? /usr/bin should appear > > > before /bin and /usr/sbin before /sbin. > > > > > > Right now $(which a-binary) would report that all /usr/... binaries > > > are located in /bin and /sbin instead; while it is mostly just > > > cosmetic, some programs (e.g. pure-gen) use the heuristic of computing > > > their default installation prefix based on the location of another > > > binary, and get confused if that prefix is empty. > > > > > > Is this a reasonable change? I'll file a bug report if that's the case. > > > > /bin and /sbin paths were already removed in latest setup package - as > > you no longer need them... so no need for bugzilla and report... > > I'm not sure, but I think bash has hardcoded PATH for /bin and /usr/bin > as well. Also, has the default linker path (in glibc, I guess?) been adjusted? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
