On 02/13/2012 09:42 AM, Nils Philippsen wrote: > On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 15:29 +0100, Laurent Rineau wrote: >> Le mardi 07 février 2012 14:21:53 Laurent Rineau a écrit : >>> From release 4.0, the CGAL libraries will be released under LGPLv3+ for the >>> foundations, and GPLv3+ for the high level packages (instead of LGPLv2 and >>> QPL respectively). >> >> In the CGAL.spec file, I mentionned "License: LGPLv3+ and GPLv3+". Could not I >> simplify that into: "License: GPLv3+"? > > You should probably ask this question on the fedora-legal mailing list > (on Cc). Without looking at the code, the answer is "maybe". If the libraries are composed of a combination of LGPLv3+ and GPLv3+ sources, then it would be accurate to simplify to "License: GPLv3+". If the package contains some libraries under LGPLv3+, and some binaries which are under GPLv3+, then "License: LGPLv3+ and GPLv3+" is appropriate. Hope that helps, ~tom == Fedora Project -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
