Andrea Musuruane wrote: > Hi all, > a reporter just submitted this bug against tecnoballz: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789544 > > After closer inspection, I see that the RPM doesn't require the needed > libraries: > > $ rpm -q --requires tecnoballz > /bin/sh > /bin/sh > config(tecnoballz) = 0.92-11.fc16 > hicolor-icon-theme > rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 > rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 > rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 > rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 Is %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/tecnoballz marked as executable after the %install step? I have found that RPMbuild doesn't pick up dependencies from shared libraries if they don't have the execute privilege bits set. Presumably that goes for executables too. It would be strange though if GCC doesn't mark the executable as executable. Björn Persson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
