80 wrote: > 2012/2/10 Neal Becker <ndbecker2@xxxxxxxxx>: >> >> Really? This is the only answer? Can't we tweek rpm/yum to accomodate this? >> Does anyone understand what is causing it? Why would pip install the >> egg-info differently than rpm? >> >> -- >> devel mailing list >> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > Python guidelines recommends that packagers installs python eggs using > distutils (python setup.py install as recommended in guidelines) while > pip use the same install method as easy_install (provided by > setuptools/distribute). The former one install egg metadata as a file, > the latter as a directory, that's not a packaging/rpm issue. > > @+ > H. Yes, but trying to be helpful to users is a fedora packaging/rpm issue. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
