On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Tomas Mraz <tmraz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 04:24 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 02:14:53AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> >> > IMHO, FESCo needs to accept that sometimes they make a mistake (especially >> > if the vote was disputed to begin with) and revote. UsrMove should have been >> > unapproved, not only for F17, but forever. >> >> So, just to be clear, you're saying that even if usrmove had landed in >> an entirely perfect and complete form the day after F16 branched, it >> should still have been rejected? > > You're talking about completely theoretical situation nobody is arguing > on. Well Keven wrote "UsrMove should have been unapproved, not only for F17, but forever." ... so he just oppose the feature per se not its state. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
