On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 09:55:03AM +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: > FHS is "vague" about this one, so the installation into /opt was > forbidden. UsrMove was against FHS and it passed. I guess it need better > explanation, then you gave us. I know that this is a rehash of previous discussions, but it's a stretch to claim that usrmove is against the FHS - the most you can really argue is that there's a requirement for recovery tools to be in the root file system, but given that there's also a statement that /boot contains data used before the kernel starts executing user-space processes it's clear that this predates the modern initramfs. It's explicitly permitted that the mandated directories in / be symlinks. >From a practical perspective, I do tend to agree that putting software under /opt/fedora would be in line with the FHS and also unlikely to break anything. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
