On 02/07/2012 09:21 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Bohuslav Kabrda <bkabrda@xxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:bkabrda@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > > Again, citing FHS: > "Distributions may install software in /opt, but must not modify or > delete software installed by the local system administrator without > the assent of the local system administrator." > > How can this be interpreted as "non-OS vendor supplied"? > > > This is one of many places in which FHS is vague but that's the common > interpretation all distributions rely on > > Rahul > > FHS is "vague" about this one, so the installation into /opt was forbidden. UsrMove was against FHS and it passed. I guess it need better explanation, then you gave us. Marcela -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
