Re: Does anyone still need to create legacy HFS filesystems?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 02:43 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 06:25:50PM -0600, David Lehman wrote:
> 
> > My understanding is that the so-called "Apple Bootstrap" filesystem
> > required for ppc Macs to boot is HFS. That's what anaconda uses for it.
> > If we could be using HFS+ instead, fine.
> 
> Is that created with hfsplus-utils or with parted?

We use hformat, which I think is from hfsutils, so probably not what you
are talking about. Sorry for the noise.

> 
> -- 
> Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux