Re: Does anyone still need to create legacy HFS filesystems?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 09:54:12PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 06:25:50PM -0600, David Lehman wrote:
> >
> >> My understanding is that the so-called "Apple Bootstrap" filesystem
> >> required for ppc Macs to boot is HFS. That's what anaconda uses for it.
> >> If we could be using HFS+ instead, fine.
> >
> > Is that created with hfsplus-utils or with parted?
> 
> I think it calls mkofboot, which is a shell script that calls a bunch of
> commands, but it uses commands from hfsutils (which is not the
> same as hfsplusutils or hfsplus-tools, wtf).

Ok, so that doens't sound like a problem.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux