Re: Does anyone still need to create legacy HFS filesystems?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 05:45:38PM -0800, John Reiser wrote:
> > Does anyone object [to dropping support for HFS]?
> 
> Plain HFS has no journal, so there are workloads where HFS is faster
> than HFS+ which has a journal.  Is it economical to cater to such cases?
> Probably not.  However, I do have a PowerPC Mac Mini that runs plain HFS
> and Fedora 10 with ext3.

Plain HFS+ isn't journalled either - that's an optional extension.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux