Re: Does anyone still need to create legacy HFS filesystems?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



El Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:45:38 -0800
John Reiser <jreiser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> escribió:
> > Does anyone object [to dropping support for HFS]?
> 
> Plain HFS has no journal, so there are workloads where HFS is faster
> than HFS+ which has a journal.  Is it economical to cater to such
> cases? Probably not.  However, I do have a PowerPC Mac Mini that runs
> plain HFS and Fedora 10 with ext3.
> 

Linux doesnt support HFS+ rw, if the filesystem has journalling turned
on you can only mount it read only

kernel: [785311.970344] hfs: write access to a journaled filesystem is
not supported, use the force option at your own risk, mounting read-only


Dennis
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux