On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 20:43 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Then you have misunderstood it, unfortunately. I'm not against EOL ticket > cleanup procedures in general. I'm against closing tickets repeatedly > after it has been shown that an issue is still present in the current dist > and nobody has proven the opposite. Especially, if a problem is due to a > packaging issue in a specific package (and that has been pointed out > explicitly), a bug zapper could notice that the package has not been > modified (beyond automated rebuilds) and _cannot_ fix the issue. Ah, sorry: the ones I clicked from your post did not have such comments, so I thought you were just complaining about cleanups in general. What's needed to be sure the bug doesn't get closed is for the Version field to be bumped to a release that's not going EOL. A comment may do the job, but there's usually hundreds of bugs in the list to be EOLed and it's usually a single person compiling the EOL list; they don't have time to inspect _every_ ticket manually (the weeding is more along the lines of 'look through the summary list for bugs that look like they may be special cases'). -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
