Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v3] Retiring packages for F-17

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v3] Retiring packages for F-17
From: Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:04:23 +0100
Delivered-to: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20120126205639.GA797@wolff.to>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:56:39 -0600, BWI (Bruno) wrote:

> > Orphan xmms-pulse
> 
> Since I actually use xmms, I'm taking xmms-pulse.

http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-January/161136.html
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v3] Retiring packages for F-17
  - From: Bruno Wolff III

References:
- [ACTION REQUIRED v3] Retiring packages for F-17
  - From: Bill Nottingham
- Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v3] Retiring packages for F-17
  - From: Bruno Wolff III

Prev by Date: Re: gcc 4.7 changes binary behaviors ?
Next by Date: Re: Unity For Fedora (As in OpenSUSE or Arch)
Previous by thread: Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v3] Retiring packages for F-17
Next by thread: Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v3] Retiring packages for F-17
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux