On 01/28/2012 12:23 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 11:15:11 -0600 > Andrew Wyatt <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > ...snip... > ... > > I think the way forward is the one I outlined in: > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-January/161632.html > > Until those interested can organize and present a compelling case, I > fear threads like this one aren't too much use. > Possibly - but without the support from at least some of the Fedora core team (fesco, board, key redhatters etc) and possibly some on the RH business side recognizing some potential benefit in the enterprise setting, this is quite likely not to go too far .. and so far I'm not aware of much support for this .. This can of course be because these key folk, after careful consideration, do not see it as a viable choice to make for Fedora and/or ultimately its impact on RHEL. They are, after all, key players for good reason(s) ... I cannot imagine they are not familiar with the pros/cons of such an approach. The benefits/drawbacks of a rolling release are rather well known these days (notwithstanding those that somehow still believe rawhide is a rolling release .. :-) )... Given that, do folks still believe it could be worthwhile for the rolling-releasers to build a case in a wiki somewhere? gene -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
