On 01/27/2012 01:43 PM, Jef Spaleta wrote:
So this is all for the benefit of the/some "Vendor"?On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:if you finally want have /bin as symlink forever this whole change is only wasted time and makes no sense at allIf you haven't read the new summary write-up on the benefits of the /user feature that I think you would benefit from reading it. http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/TheCaseForTheUsrMerge If you have read it, then I fear you either don't fully understand or do not value the long term benefits associated with the filesystem snapshotting nor the utility of having read-only shared vendor supplied /usr across many guest instances. If those stated benefits are achievable in practise, I think carrying around a few symlinks in / till the heat death of the universe is a reasonable cost to pay to achieve a stateless vendor OS contained in /usr. -jef --
Stephen Clark NetWolves Director of Technology Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.clark@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.netwolves.com |
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
