Re: UsrMove feature breaking "yum upgrade" upgrades from older releases to F17?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 23:53 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/118#comment:7
> 
> Well, IMHO if this is not safe to do in a %pretrans, it is not safe to do at 
> all.

You seem to imply doing things in %pretrans is somehow safer than
somewhere else. I don't think so -- as Panu said: "The whole %pretrans
thing is a scary hack that's best seen as a last resort to do the
minimal required tweak that just cannot be done elsewhere..."

> I don't understand why we absolutely HAVE to change directories to symlinks 
> when we KNOW RPM doesn't support this, and that in directories as essential 
> as /bin etc.

We could wait until you have convinced people, maintainers and users
alike, to fix their packages and scripts all in one go over to using the
new paths, so we get by without compat symlinks. But I don't think we
want to wait for that. Agreed, it'd be a whole lot nicer if RPM could
handle symlink <-> non-symlink transitions without crutches like this
one, but right now it can't.

Nils
-- 
Nils Philippsen      "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase 
Red Hat               a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty
nils@xxxxxxxxxx       nor Safety."  --  Benjamin Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint:      C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F  656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux