On 26/01/2012 8:58 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
where is the improvement or does anything get better if things
worked for years got damaged? you definition of improvement
must have a bug!
first thing. i agree that the Linux Filesystem needs to be cleaned up.
by doing what redhat/Fedora is progressing to do with the filesystem
makes it easier. its been Noted in OsNews about it. im sure elsewhere
to. Google is your friend, use it. if you dont know where the
improvement is, use Google. im not google. or lookup the feature page
which im sure has some kinda Documentation about it. Fedora is to Test
Up-coming Technology Distro that may make its way into RHEL. take for
instance Grub2. may not even see its way into RHEL7 till its stable and
at 2.0 . not 1.99. if your not happy with what Fedora/Redhat are doing
there's is a list of Linux Distributions you can use at your own
leisure. but by Demanding Fedora/Redhat not do this is a bit silly. im
sure you were or have been told many times Fedora is a Testing Release
for RHEL but this " Demanding " approach of yours isnt really getting
anywhere . your one of these people that hate " Change" but there's no
need to start Demanding things you want yourself. just because its gonna
ruin you from using yum to upgrade when all one has to do is download a
DvD. i know you have said it before that a DvD upgrade could or can go
wrong. but here's my point. lets say your downloading a upgrade and the
upgrade gets to 87% and your power goes out for some time. what are you
gonna do then? you'll come to the mailing list and say my yum upgrade
doesnt work. when all you had to do was download a DvD. only time i
have seen a DvD install go wrong and that's when some chooses the wrong
repo's during install. but yes lets go back to the dark Ages and forget
about Technology. im all for redhat/Fedora doing this if it simplifies
the filesystem
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
