Re: The question of rolling release?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/24/2012 05:17 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
when i see that services which was not converted to systemd
needs features which were not available with the systemd
of F15 this is a clear sign that systemd was NOT ready for
a GA release

That missing feature is "PathExistsGlob=", isn't it?
So the solution is easy - just have cups.service start the classical way: by pulling it into the default target. Cups worked without path-based activation when it was a SysV service and it can work just the same as a native service.

so updates should make it ready for GA

how do you imagine that even maintainers could have
converted services for the F15 release with a
non-finished systemd-version?

I am amazed at the sophistry of the argument.

We sometimes add new features to systemd that service writers might find convenient to use in their unit files. I guess that does make systemd "non-finished" when interpreted literally. What follows from that when it comes to suitability for a release? Absolutely nothing.

Michal
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux