Re: The question of rolling release?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/24/2012 08:09 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 01/24/2012 09:08 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
>> On 01/24/2012 02:13 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
>>>    Fedora suffers an additional problem it seems - not only are there
>>> large changes as part of many releases, but lately some of them
>>> immediately stop being supported until the 'next big release' - which
>>> makes fedora far less reliable and desirable - examples of this are
>>> systemd and pulse audio - there may be others.
>>
>> What the ...?
>>
> 
> 
>    systemd 26 vs 37/38 ... tho you're right yes there were/are some
> damage control fixes ... which is the point - in a rolling release model
> things like this would (should) get the proper attention they need,
> instead of moving focus on to the 'next release' ...

You are ridding on thin ice here.  systemd gets many many updates.
Claiming that it doesnt receive proper attention is very much
unsubstantiated.  I think you should go back on this claim.


Rahul
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux