On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:53:32 +0100 Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Am 24.01.2012 15:48, schrieb Rahul Sundaram: > > On 01/24/2012 08:09 PM, Genes MailLists wrote: > >> On 01/24/2012 09:08 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote: > >>> On 01/24/2012 02:13 PM, Genes MailLists wrote: > >>>> Fedora suffers an additional problem it seems - not only are > >>>> there large changes as part of many releases, but lately some of > >>>> them immediately stop being supported until the 'next big > >>>> release' - which makes fedora far less reliable and desirable - > >>>> examples of this are systemd and pulse audio - there may be > >>>> others. > >>> > >>> What the ...? > >>> > >> > >> > >> systemd 26 vs 37/38 ... tho you're right yes there were/are some > >> damage control fixes ... which is the point - in a rolling release > >> model things like this would (should) get the proper attention > >> they need, instead of moving focus on to the 'next release' ... > > > > You are ridding on thin ice here. systemd gets many many updates. > > Claiming that it doesnt receive proper attention is very much > > unsubstantiated. I think you should go back on this claim. > > where are they for F15? > > systemd-26-14.fc15 > systemd-37-9.fc16 > > this is BAD because the version in F15 was a really EARLY state > services for F16 like cups rely on systemd-features that do NOT > exist in F15 - so you have no chance converting sysv to systemd > in an easy way on your F15 installation > > this is NOT "receive proper attention" You are blindly looking at version numbers here. ;) Take a look at the number of patches where fixes and other enhancements have been backported to the F16/F15 packages: https://community.dev.fedoraproject.org/packages/systemd (Use the Fedora 16 release from the pulldown there). The maintainer(s) are backporting those items that are safe to backport. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
