On 01/24/2012 03:39 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 01/24/2012 09:08 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
On 01/24/2012 02:13 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
Fedora suffers an additional problem it seems - not only are there
large changes as part of many releases, but lately some of them
immediately stop being supported until the 'next big release' - which
makes fedora far less reliable and desirable - examples of this are
systemd and pulse audio - there may be others.
What the ...?
systemd 26 vs 37/38 ... tho you're right yes there were/are some
damage control fixes ... which is the point - in a rolling release model
things like this would (should) get the proper attention they need,
instead of moving focus on to the 'next release' ...
I personally would not mind a rolling Fedora release.
But we are not currently following a rolling release model, so your
criticism of systemd maintenance on stable Fedora branches (what you
called "an additional problem") is invalid. We put in a lot of bugfixes
from upstream. We follow the Fedora Updates Policy and avoid radical
changes.
Michal
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
