On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 07:13:03AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > Is there any support at all within the development community for a > > rolling release version of Fedora (and possibly ulitimately Redhat)? > > Is there a possibility that not moving to rolling release could > > ultimately damage Fedora in the future as other distributions increase > > their support base? > > How is rawhide not a rolling release? Or perhaps better asked, what > about rawhide makes it > unsuitable for use as a rolling Fedora release? I would say Rawhide isn't a rolling release due to it being considered unstable packages; i.e., ones that have not been fully vetted. It's analogous to Debian's Sid. -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
Attachment:
pgpG2uwtRfiqV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
