Once upon a time, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> said: > On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:15:57 -0600 > Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I would think that making it release based rather than time based > > should be okay. If there have been N released shipped without > > package foo, then foo needs to be re-reviewed (with N being only 1 or > > 2). > > Possibly, but that info isn't super easy to find. You would need to > look at the scm-commits list to see when it was retired. If it was release-1 or release-2, those are both current and still getting updates; checking the current trees on a mirror would show if the package was in either release. -- Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
