Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for F-17

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> said:
> b) unretirement
> 
> This could be pretty massive changes. If something was retired years
> ago, the entire spec could be very different. Or it could have been
> yesterday. But making the time variable for re-review makes it much
> more complex. Last time we looked at this, it was an easy way to tell
> if something needed re-review. Is it orphaned? then just take it. Is it
> retired? then re-review it. 

I would think that making it release based rather than time based should
be okay.  If there have been N released shipped without package foo,
then foo needs to be re-reviewed (with N being only 1 or 2).

-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux