On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 08:39 +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: > I use closed/upstream, when I already fixed it in upstream. This bug > should be closed with number of release, where it is fixed or with the > link to the commit. I wouldn't blame this state for not fixing bug in > some projects. I guess instead of closed/upstream we would see more > closed/wontfix|cantfix. I use POST for that. "A patch or solution believed to resolve this matter has been proposed (POSTed) for inclusion in the package or kernel." For non-kernel packages I read that as meaning that the patch is in-hand upstream, and not yet built in Fedora. Tim. */
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
