On 01/20/2012 08:39 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
On 01/20/2012 12:31 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I use closed/upstream, when I already fixed it in upstream. This bug
should be closed with number of release, where it is fixed or with the
link to the commit. I wouldn't blame this state for not fixing bug in
some projects.
Users do!
To them, what you are doing is to "ignore them for now" and to
"sit-out bugs", instead. Whether they will find this tolerable or
consider you to be a non-collaborations jerk widely depend on the actual
impact the bug they reported has on them.
> I guess instead of closed/upstream we would see more
closed/wontfix|cantfix.
Delegating bugs for fixing to upstream, because you can't fix for
whatever reasons isn't much of a problem.
The problem is the attitude "CLOSED UPSTEAM" communicates: Cheating
about the current shape a package is in Fedora.
Ralf
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
