Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
From: Michael Stahnke <mastahnke@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:39:58 -0800
Delivered-to: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1326354617.1932.5.camel@PGT500>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I grabbed ruby-shadow, as it's needed for Puppet.  I would love co-maintainers.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
  - From: Toshio Kuratomi
- Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
  - From: Peter Gordon

Prev by Date: rawhide report: 20120112 changes
Next by Date: Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
Previous by thread: Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
Next by thread: Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux