Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I've taken iec16022 for the Fedora 15/16/Devel branches. I would
appreciate assistance in the EPEL branches though. (I've left those
orphaned.)

And if it's agreeable with Casper, I've also requested comaintainership
of qrencode. =)

I have done so because another of my packages, gLabels, requires both of
these. As usual, comaintainers are welcome.

Thanks and regards.
-- 
Peter Gordon (codergeek42) <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Who am I? :: http://thecodergeek.com/about-me

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux