On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > if a software-package, information, disclosure is NOT NEEDED it has > to be disabled - again: take some security education! And, there we go. Convince upstream to change their behavior (but, read their FAQ on this exact question first, and try to understand why they've chosen that stance), or convince the current openssh package maintainers why they should patch the Fedora version of openssh in defiance of upstream's wishes. That will be much more productive than insisting that people who are disagreeing with you in good faith are uneducated. -- Ed Marshall <esm@xxxxxxxxx> Felix qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas. http://esm.logic.net/ -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
