Re: Bad package selection practices in Fedora packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 03:09:07PM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
> I suppose I have to go to the gnome lists and raise Cain about this
> kind of fundamental mis-engineering?

If you want bugs to be fixed, then please file bugreports. Tracker
should NOT have a noticeable impact on performance (in the default
config). Of course it'll have some measurable impact, but if you can
notice the impact in the default configuration, then something is wrong.

>From what I understood (before GNOME 3.0), tracker was changed so the
performance impact is not noticeable. E.g. I have tracker running but I
don't notice the impact of it. I do not have an SSD.

I think I missed that other thread about misusing the kernel, so have to
read up on what was said there.


PS: Didn't know the term raise Cain, but if you mean:
"To be 'raising Cain' is to be causing trouble or creating an uproar."

Don't do above @ GNOME, would only cause you to be banned.

-- 
Regards,
Olav
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux