On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > nonsense > > they HAD the manpower to do this rebuilds for so.114 to so.115 > so WTF why they jumping to a outdated version instead so.119? > > doing such nonsense and after that whine about to few manpower > is a little bit strange - the rebuilds do not take really time Please... I'm begging you. Can you please stop asking rhetorical questions concerning the management of a 3rd party repository here. We legitimately can not give you an authoritative an answer to that question... and you know this. You KNOW this is not the correct mailinglist and yet you persist. Enough. This is not the appropriate place to air your grievances about rpmfusion packaging decisions and as a group here we can neither adequately defend current 3rd party repository management nor is it possible for us as a group to do anything to make your personally feel better by making any changes. rpmfusion has their own communication and governance model that is not beholden to the governance model the the Fedora project employees to arbitrate over technical grievances. All we can do is encourage you to _engage_ with the management of that 3rd party repository to resolve your grievances. Which we have done repeatedly now. I'm saying this as politely as I can. Move this into the appropriate rpmfusion development communication channel and out of here. Continuing to get yourself emotionally worked up about your grievances here is not going to lead to satisfactory progress for anyone. Not for you, not for other rpmfusion users, not for the rpmfusion developers, and not for any else here either. If you continue to persist in second guessing our collective good faith attempts at explaining the situation to you, I will not be as polite in further communication. Good day to you sir, -jef -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
