On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 12:33 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > I answered Denis immediately at the first post and he concurred it was > a problem. I like to think the conversation evolved as we discussed. It's probably not worth pursuing this much further, but I'd just note that the specific sub-thread I replied to was not along these lines. It was specifically about the use of 'random VMs' to form a cloud. The very first line of quoted text in my mail is: > > On 12/07/2011 01:25 PM, seth vidal wrote: > > > > > If I were going to use random vm's I'd want to: In general, I'd suggest that if someone 'misunderstands' what you're talking about, it's worth considering the possibility that perhaps the discussion was not as straightforward as you thought, and the 'misunderstanding' is as much on your part as the other person's, instead of firing off a mail filled with lines like "I don't think you understand", "I don't think you understand where the insecurity is in the system", "No one has EVER seriously considered a random person's VM. ever." (clearly not accurate, if you follow the context of my post), and "do you understand now?", essentially telling me I'm being an idiot and to pay closer attention. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
