On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Adam Jackson <ajax@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 13:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> I did test rebuilds in mock of all rawhide packages that are reported to >> be dependent on libpng. Out of 964 packages with dependencies on libpng, >> we have: >> >> Packages that rebuilt successfully with 1.5 658 >> Packages that FTBFS for non-libpng reasons 186 >> Packages that rebuilt with 1.4, but not 1.5 74 >> Packages that need help even with 1.4 46 > > I've been doing driveby rebuilds for some of these that happen to have > been in a default install on my machine, but we still have a huge pile > of things built against the old libpng in rawhide: > > [ajax@f17 cairomm]$ repoquery --whatrequires libpng-compat | wc -l > 786 > > Does anyone object to me just kicking a mass rebuild for this? I'll > happily follow up with the list of build failures. Go for it, I think it makes sense. For those that don't support 1.5 they can stay against the compat in the mean time. Peter -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
