Re: Upgrading libpng: shall we move to 1.4.x or 1.5.x?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 13:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> I did test rebuilds in mock of all rawhide packages that are reported to
> be dependent on libpng.  Out of 964 packages with dependencies on libpng,
> we have:
> 
> Packages that rebuilt successfully with 1.5	658
> Packages that FTBFS for non-libpng reasons	186
> Packages that rebuilt with 1.4, but not 1.5	74
> Packages that need help even with 1.4		46

I've been doing driveby rebuilds for some of these that happen to have
been in a default install on my machine, but we still have a huge pile
of things built against the old libpng in rawhide:

[ajax@f17 cairomm]$ repoquery --whatrequires libpng-compat | wc -l
786

Does anyone object to me just kicking a mass rebuild for this?  I'll
happily follow up with the list of build failures.

- ajax

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux