Re: Notes on Yum Changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 09:36, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le mardi 07 septembre 2004 à 09:09 -0400, seth vidal a écrit :
> > > What multiple repos? Why do you suppose there have to be multiple repos
> > > for this to happen?
> > > 
> > > The latest problem of barfing due to obsolete packages happened recently
> > > with xorg.
> > 
> > The problem was with xorg in RAWHIDE. Not in a normal repository. If
> > people want to run rawhide then they can figure out some subset of
> > pkging problems that come up.
> 
> You have most of the problems of Rawhide on standard RHAS/Fedora
> systemes. It may be less frequent, but usually you don't have the leeway
> to fix it you get with a Rawhide box (entreprise critical, etc etc)
> 
> « It's in Rawhide, I can ignore it » has always been a poor excuse IMHO.

I completely disagree. Rawhide frequently has unresolvable dependencies.
It frequently has randomly introduced version updates that are rolled
back in the next rawhide update.

Those things, which catch something like 90% of the users, do not happen
in stable releases. They do happen in broken repositories though. But
I'm not sure that just continuing when a repository is broken is in
anyone's best interest.

-sv




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux