On 11/22/2011 01:48 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > The problem here is that in my eyes there are no inactive contributors and > there shouldn't be anything preventing people from contributing (even if it's one update per year). > While I agree that projects that FTBFS, can't be installed and etc. should be purged every release, everything > else should be out of question because the fact that someone considers something legacy > doesn't mean that it's not usable for others. And to make it clear handling bugs is not a measure at all about activity. > So if you come with a technical list of things that make sure that a package is unusable for 100%(e.g. can't be installed because of missing dependency) of the users > it's not a question that it should be removed, but if there is someone that signed as a maintainer and > there is even a slight possibility that someone can use nothing more can be required from the maintainer. > Note the usage of required, all kind of suggestions can be made and people can do additional work but everyone should do as much as he can/want/have fun to do. > If more than you and Kevin Kofler are working under this assumption than the whole scenario begs the question why we even bother with QA and Security et all... JBG -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
