On 11/21/2011 10:03 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > This has come up nearly every release cycle. Problem is that nobody can seem to agree on what an appropriate "sign of life" would be, no has made a serious FESCo proposal for a contrived sign of life. > > I don't think anybody disagrees (well maybe KKoffler) that unmaintained software should be discovered and ejected from the distro, the entirety of the problem lies how to discover (as well as side issues about what to do about maintainers that are active for one package, but completely ignore 3 others, etc…) Well comes logically to me that at least the maintainer would be stripped of those packages he is ignoring. > > So if you are serious about wanting this fixed, draft a proposal, figure out who's going to do the coding work, and bring it to FESCo. I would think this work directly falls under releng jurisdiction ( given that releng is ultimately responsible for the bits being shipped to end users and at the same time are the once most familiar with the inner packaging process ) in accordance with what FPC or FESCO decide. How does FPC handle packagers that violate the packaging guidelines? JBG -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
