Re: Fesco membership policies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Montag, den 14.11.2011, 12:31 -0500 schrieb Clyde E. Kunkel:

> 
> Multidisciplinary membership is good.  However, please keep a balance in 
> that no one group is over represented.
> 
> Also, how about a non-technical member from the general user community? 

I'd say no. Not only because I think that we need technical people to
understand technical decisions, but also for the very same argument you
just gave: Keep a balance in that no group is over represented. The
ambassadors group for example is huge and could easily get a lot of
"their" candidates into FESCo.

Don't get me wrong: I like having ambassadors in FESCo, I am one myself
and a member of FESCo, too. But I am in FESCo as a packager and so
should be others: Whoever wants to run for a technical body needs to be
member of at least one technical group.

Regards,
Christoph


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux