On 11/14/2011 11:19 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Matthew Garrett<mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Something that was brought up at the last fesco meeting is that >> fesco membership is currently restricted to members of the packaging >> group. That's arguably overly restrictive - fesco is intended to be the >> body with technical oversight over the entire project, not merely >> packaging, and in that situation it seems odd to restrict membership to >> a subset of the people under fesco's pervue. >> >> There's a few things we can do here. We can keep the status quo. We can >> add new groups such as qa. Or we can open it to the entire project and >> just assume that the electorate will ensure that nobody inappropriate >> gets elected. >> >> Anyone have opinions on what we should be doing here? > > Sounds reasonable to me, is changes to FESCo something that needs to > be approved by the Board? (adding f-a-b mailing list for > clarification). > > Peter Multidisciplinary membership is good. However, please keep a balance in that no one group is over represented. Also, how about a non-technical member from the general user community? Should provide a nice balance to the technical side. -- Regards, OldFart -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
