On Mon, 2004-09-06 at 20:04 +0100, Rui Miguel Seabra wrote: > Well, I thought there was a process for package submission, review and > what not. Of course accidents happen. But this is no excuse, or is a > "meta packager" like yum not better than plain rpm in itself? > > As far as I can see, I have to solve about as many problems as I did > without a metapackager (--obsoletes, --exclude=..., etc...). The job of > a meta packager is making things easier. This is, of course, assuming I already have the RPMS. The automatic download of what's needed saves me a lot of time! Thanks! Rui -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
