On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 16:15:05 +0000, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Something that was brought up at the last fesco meeting is that > fesco membership is currently restricted to members of the packaging > group. That's arguably overly restrictive - fesco is intended to be the > body with technical oversight over the entire project, not merely > packaging, and in that situation it seems odd to restrict membership to > a subset of the people under fesco's pervue. > > There's a few things we can do here. We can keep the status quo. We can > add new groups such as qa. Or we can open it to the entire project and > just assume that the electorate will ensure that nobody inappropriate > gets elected. > > Anyone have opinions on what we should be doing here? I'd like to see it opened up a bit. I think at least some people in the QA team have a strong technical background and would be good to have on FESCO. The issue that came up in the discussion was that there is a good group to use to include for QA. The qa group isn't really used and proventesters is a bit broad and its future is in question. One possible solution is to start using the qa group to track the core members of the qa team. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
